Handy Guide to Libraries Consultation
For quick answer suggestions please go to 'Questions'
Background
This section blurs the
distinction between staffed and community services to favour the council’s
proposal.
The outreach team mentioned in paragraph three supporting
the volunteer libraries is formed of four people (this is the peripatetic
service referred to in consultation meetings). Staff are spread so thin it is
very unlikely a member of the public would meet them in a community library. It
is then to be questioned how well integrated the service in fact is.
Behind rather than beyond traditional services, library users
cannot pay fines or charges in community libraries, make use of much of the online
subscriptions, pay parking permits or use registrar services, i.e do much what
the council’s document suggests. What they are not telling you is that these
things require professional staff.
Online services
provision
This section
highlights the importance of a secure face-to-face relationship between public
and staff.
There is no doubt that there are experienced volunteers in
Lewisham, but their services are already in great demand. We believe it is
through the cohesive experience of front-line council staff, brought together
through many years’ service, that libraries can best support access to online
services.
This section raises the question of the need for training in
maintaining the service’s ability to expand the digital presence, something a
community library would have to consider.
Sustaining quality
and reach for a growing population
This section is highly
suspicious!
It suggests a library service has been extended to more
venues, when the reality is that five former council libraries are now
community run and book issues in these venues have fallen by up to 90%. The new
development of a library presence in Ladywell with the backing of private developers
when they are about to lose their own is sure to cause alarm.
Budget Pressures
It was suggested by journalist Lucy Mangan at the meeting at
Sandhurst School on Oct 22nd that the
council use some of its financial reserves to support its services in crisis,
which by referring to council documents she put at possibly £1bn. This assertion was challenged
by Aileen Buckton and she was not aware of the actual figure.
Possible options:
(page 6)
- Outsource the library service
- Reduce opening hours and/or close libraries
- Extend the Lewisham community library model (preferred option by council officers)
In reality, the only proposal with Mayoral approval for consultation is the “Lewisham
community library model”. The other two suggestions are red herrings and divert
from the real options open for consideration:
Cut staff from four libraries thriving in difficult
circumstances
or
SAY NO TO LIBRARY CUTS!
QUESTIONS
(Page 9)
To
what extent do you agree or disagree that changes to the Council’s public
library service are necessary?
Strongly
disagree
- Outsourcing – not an option approved for consultation
- Reduced opening hours and closing
libraries – not an option
approved for consultation
- Extend Lewisham community model – I.e. staff redundancies; a reduced,
precarious service; 70 – 90% drop in book issues
- Other…please specify below
|
No comments:
Post a Comment